Most Viewed Stories
Most Commented Stories
Save & Share this Article
Our View: State ballot a vexing proposition
Proposition 1A – No
High-speed passenger train bond
This proposition would authorize issuing $9.95 billion in
general-obligation bonds as a small down payment for a high-speed
passenger train between Los Angeles and San Francisco. To call this
project a boondoggle would be an understatement.
Proposition 2 – No
Standards for confining farm animals
This initiative promises to relieve suffering in factory farms by
mandating that veal calves, breeding pigs and egg-laying hens be
confined in cages large enough so they can move around. We sympathize
as most people would with concerns about animal cruelty, but
Proposition 2 would have unintended consequences. These regulations are
likely to result in higher food prices and farms leaving California for
lower-cost states and Mexico. Vote “no.”
Proposition 3 – No
Children’s hospital bond
Only four years ago, voters passed an almost identical $750 million
measure. Bonded debt already stands at $45 billion for
general-obligation bonds alone. We urge a “no” vote.
Proposition 4 – Yes
Waiting period, parental notification
Prop. 4 would require a physician’s office to provide parents or
guardians with a 48-hour notice before a minor has an abortion, giving
parents a chance to counsel their daughter any way they choose. No
notification would be necessary in the case of a medical emergency.
Prop. 4 is not really an abortion measure. It is about parental rights.
Proposition 5 – Yes
Nonviolent drug offenses sentencing
Opponents of this modest reform of California’s drug laws and parole
practices tell scary stories of methamphetamine dealers’ parole being
shortened from three years to six months. But the measure is designed
partly to help alleviate the woeful crowding of the state prison
system, while reducing parole for a wide range of nonviolent crimes
from three years to six months.
Proposition 6 – No
Police funding. Criminal penalties
The initiative is little more than a power grab by law enforcement
agencies, engaging in fear-mongering to expand government, increase
government spending and toughen up sentencing to unjust levels. Prop. 6
is an overly punitive, “throw money at the problem,” big government
initiative.
Proposition 7 – No
Renewable energy generation
The certainty of growing reliance on fossil fuels by developing nations
alone would far outweigh whatever relatively meager emission reductions
California might accomplish through Prop. 7.
Proposition 8 – No
Eliminates right of same-sex couples to marry
In an ideal world, the state would have little or no role in defining
or regulating so intimate a relationship as marriage. However, the
state has inserted itself into all too many aspects of our private
lives. Given that it has done so, it is only fair that it afford equal
protection to all. Vote “no.”
Proposition 9 – No
Criminal justice. Victims’ rights.
California’s prisons are overcrowded and under federal court
supervision as a result. The state Legislature and courts are
considering steps to relieve crowding with early release of
least-dangerous inmates. Prop. 9 could prevent those releases.
Proposition 10 – No
Alternative fuel vehicles, renewable energy bonds.
A variety of groups oppose this measure for good reason. Texas
billionaire T. Boone Pickens, who put up most of $3.75 million to get
the initiative on the ballot, stands to profit nicely. We urge a “no”
vote.
Proposition 11 – Yes
Legislative redistricting
We support redistricting to make political races more open and
competitive, as this initiative aims to do. Elected officials too often
behave as if they hold lifetime appointments, rather than two- and
four-year terms. We recommend a “yes” vote.
Proposition 12 – No
Veterans’ Bond Act
The subprime mortgage crisis is rooted in lax lending standards created
partly to make mortgages more affordable to more people. Now California
voters are asked to float nearly $1 billion in bonds backed by the
state’s beleaguered general fund to provide yet more subsidized loans
for one group of Californians. We recommend a “no” vote.





